Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
COURT EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-077L289Generated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

SC New York

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records39
Source linked100%
Known amount total$87,506
Recorded rangeMay 30, 2024 Aug 7, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in SC New York?

AI Vortex currently links 39 source-linked public matters associated with SC New York. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (35), Misrepresented authority (18) and Fabricated or altered quotations (12). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (15), Monetary sanction (9) and Warning or admonishment (7). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 39
Aug 7, 2026Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al.SC New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 4, 2026Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. KaloidisSC New YorkClaude and other generative AI platformsSource
Jul 22, 2026Rodriguez v. Time Warner EntertainmentSC New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 6, 2026Kevin Krzeminski v. Janine McQuillanSC New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 16, 2026Polanco v. Brooklyn Rose LLCSC New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 12, 2026Vargas v. MTA Bus Co.SC New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 1, 2026Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 28, 2026Strategic Funding Source, Inc. v. STI-NY, LLCSC New YorkUnidentifiedSource
May 12, 2026Gully v VargheseSC New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 1, 2026Drip Capital, Inc. v. SGM Socher Inc.SC New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 27, 2026In the Matter of the Application of Jonathan David RinaldiSC New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.