COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

Supreme Court

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records15

Source linked100%

Known USD amount totalNone recorded

Recorded rangeJul 3, 2025 – Oct 15, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in Supreme Court?

AI Vortex currently links 15 source-linked public matters associated with Supreme Court. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (14), Misrepresented authority (5) and Fabricated or altered quotations (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (7), Monetary sanction (6) and Dismissal or adverse disposition (3). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities14 · 93.3%Misrepresented authority5 · 33.3%Fabricated or altered quotations4 · 26.7%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

No adjudicated consequence recorded7 · 46.7%Monetary sanction6 · 40%Dismissal or adverse disposition3 · 20%Warning or admonishment1 · 6.7%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant7 · 46.7%Lawyer6 · 40%Judge2 · 13.3%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Administrative3 · 20%Contract2 · 13.3%Bankruptcy1 · 6.7%Family1 · 6.7%Other1 · 6.7%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 15

Oct 15, 2026Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited v. Gstaad Hotels Private LimitedSupreme CourtUnidentifiedSource

Jul 2, 2026Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr.Supreme CourtAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 5, 2026Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu & Kashmir BankSupreme CourtAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 1, 2026Chen v. Goodmore Investments & TawaSupreme CourtAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Mar 22, 2026Ben Cohen v. Ramat GanSupreme CourtAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Mar 22, 2026Ben-Cohen v. Municipality of Ramat GanSupreme CourtAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Feb 27, 2026Gummadi Usha Rani & Anr. v. Sure Mallikarjuna Rao & Anr.Supreme CourtAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Feb 11, 2026Jones v. Family Court at WhangareiSupreme CourtAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Feb 3, 2026ОСОБА_1 v. Головне управління Пенсійного фонду України в Кіровоградській областіSupreme CourtNo tool named in sourceSource

Jan 15, 2026ОСОБА_1 v. Головне управління Пенсійного фонду України в Житомирській областіSupreme CourtNo tool named in sourceSource

Jan 1, 2026Husni Al Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al.Supreme CourtAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Dec 28, 2025Herzel Hagigi v. Official ReceiverSupreme CourtAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

Fake Citations14 shared records None Adjudicated7 shared records Monetary6 shared records Israel6 shared records Misrepresented Authority5 shared records Fabricated Quotes4 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Supreme Court Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 27, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/supreme-court/report (last visited Oct. 27, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 27). Supreme Court Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/supreme-court/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/supreme-court/report (accessed 2026-10-27)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.