Updated October 20, 2026 · checked against sources listed below

There is no single best AI tool for lawyers; there is a best tool per task. For firm-wide platforms, shortlist Harvey or Legora. For legal research, compare CoCounsel, Lexis+ with Protégé and vLex Vincent. For contract drafting in Word, look at Spellbook. For low-cost general drafting and analysis, Claude has a public price ($20 per seat per month billed annually on the Team plan, per claude.com/pricing). Most legal-specific tools sell by quote, so we say so instead of guessing a number.

Comparison table: 12 legal AI tools by task

Prices and pricing models as published by each vendor or on the linked AI Vortex page, checked 2026-10-20. “Quote” means the vendor shows no public price.
ToolBest forHow it is pricedSource
HarveyLarge-firm platform: assistant, document vault, agentsQuote only. No public priceharvey.ai and Harvey pricing 2026
LegoraFirm workspace: Word add-in, Tabular Review, research, agentDemo / quote. No public price on the sitelegora.com
CoCounsel (Thomson Reuters)Research and workflows tied to WestlawQuote-based. Third-party estimates conflict, so none is shown hereCoCounsel pricing 2026
Lexis+ with ProtégéResearch inside the LexisNexis ecosystemPricing varies by organization size, capabilities and content scopeLexisNexis Lexis+ with Protégé page
vLex VincentResearch across jurisdictions; now part of ClioFree trial or demo. No public price on the pagevlex.com
PaxtonIndividual attorneys: research, drafting$499 per user per month, or $2,999 per user per yearpaxton.ai/pricing
ClaudeGeneral drafting, analysis and summariesTeam standard seat $20/seat/month billed annually, $25 monthly. Pro $17 annual, $20 monthlyclaude.com/pricing
SpellbookContract drafting and review inside WordCustom pricing based on team membersspellbook.legal and Spellbook pricing 2026
IroncladEnterprise contract lifecycle management (CLM)Custom quote based on products, users and workflowsironcladapp.com/pricing
JuroCLM for in-house teams that want a browser editorPlans based on contract volume and integrations; unlimited usersjuro.com/pricing
LuminanceContract review at enterprise scaleDemo request. No public priceluminance.com
EverlawE-discovery and document reviewQuote-based; see our pricing page for the questions to askEverlaw pricing 2026

Our ranking logic is task fit, not a single score. Read the short verdicts below, then open the tool-specific pages for pricing detail.

Firm-wide platforms: Harvey and Legora

Best for: Firms that want one AI workspace across practice groups and can run a procurement process.

harvey.ai describes a platform with agents, a document Vault and research Knowledge. legora.com lists a Word add-in, Outlook add-in, Tabular Review, Workflows, Legal Research, an Agent and Monitors. Neither publishes a price: both route buyers to a demo. Treat any per-seat figure you see elsewhere as an unverified estimate.

For the head-to-head, read Harvey vs Legora. For cheaper routes, see Harvey alternatives 2026 and Legora alternatives 2026.

Best for: Lawyers whose main need is cited, authority-backed research.

CoCounsel is sold by Thomson Reuters and is quote-based; our CoCounsel pricing 2026 page explains why third-party estimates disagree. LexisNexis states that Lexis+ with Protégé pricing varies by organization size, capabilities and content scope (LexisNexis Lexis+ with Protégé page). vLex Vincent is offered with a free trial or demo on vlex.com, which also shows vLex as part of Clio.

Whichever you pick, verify every citation against the primary source. The Westlaw-and-Lexis angle has its own page: Westlaw and Lexis alternatives with AI.

Individual attorneys and solos: Paxton and Claude

Best for: Solo lawyers who need a published price and no sales call.

Paxton publishes two individual prices: $499 per user per month and $2,999 per user per year (paxton.ai/pricing). Claude publishes $20 per seat per month on the Team plan billed annually ($25 billed monthly) and $17 per month for Pro billed annually ($20 monthly) (claude.com/pricing). Claude is a general model, not a legal research database, so it does not replace verified citations.

Our comparison of the general models is Claude vs ChatGPT for legal.

Contracts: Spellbook, Ironclad, Juro and Luminance

Best for: Spellbook for drafting in Word; Ironclad or Juro for lifecycle workflows; Luminance for enterprise review.

Spellbook describes custom pricing based on team members (spellbook.legal). Ironclad asks for a custom quote (ironcladapp.com/pricing). Juro says plans depend on contract volume and integrations, with unlimited users (juro.com/pricing). Luminance asks you to request a demo (luminance.com).

Alternatives pages: Spellbook alternatives and Ironclad alternatives. Category ranking: best AI for contract review.

E-discovery: Everlaw

Best for: Litigation teams with large document sets.

E-discovery is priced differently from research or drafting tools. Start with Everlaw pricing 2026 and best e-discovery AI tools.

How to choose

The bottom line: Pick by task. Harvey or Legora for firm platforms, CoCounsel, Lexis+ with Protégé or vLex for research, Spellbook for Word drafting, Claude or Paxton when you need a published price, Ironclad or Juro for contract workflows.

Sources and what we checked

Public vendor pages fetched on 2026-10-20. Where a vendor shows no price, this page shows none.

AI-Assisted Research. This page was researched and written with AI assistance. Prices and product facts were checked against the public sources listed above on 2026-10-20; where a figure could not be verified it is left out. Vendors can request corrections at manuel@aivortex.io.