HomeCases12 Os 124/25i

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

12 Os 124/25i

OG · Nov 3, 2025

AustriaEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycriminaltrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Numerous cited decisions contained incorrect Prüfzeichen (wrong docket numbers) and were relied on by the complaint.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Numerous cited decisions contained incorrect Prüfzeichen (wrong docket numbers) and were relied on by the complaint. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 13 Os 15/17f was cited for the concept of 'Kuriertätern', but the court found the cited decision did not contain that asserted content. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 13 Os 99/15f was cited regarding 'Alias Namen' of telephone calls, but the court found the decision did not support that assertion. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 13 Os 81/07x was cited for a so-called 'Verschleifungsverbot', which the court determined the decision did not establish as claimed. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 14 Os 11/09p was cited for an 'umfassendes Geständnis' and the 'präventive Wirkung der Ersthaftierung', but the court found those content-attributions inaccurate.
Why it matters now: Multiple wrong docket numbers in one brief signals AI use; require a second-reader cite check before any appellate filing.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Numerous cited decisions contained incorrect Prüfzeichen (wrong docket numbers) and were relied on by the complaint.

Operational lesson

Multiple wrong docket numbers in one brief signals AI use; require a second-reader cite check before any appellate filing.

Record details

CourtOG

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateNov 3, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Numerous cited decisions contained incorrect Prüfzeichen (wrong docket numbers) and were relied on by the complaint.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 13 Os 15/17f was cited for the concept of 'Kuriertätern', but the court found the cited decision did not contain that asserted content.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 13 Os 99/15f was cited regarding 'Alias Namen' of telephone calls, but the court found the decision did not support that assertion.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 13 Os 81/07x was cited for a so-called 'Verschleifungsverbot', which the court determined the decision did not establish as claimed.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 14 Os 11/09p was cited for an 'umfassendes Geständnis' and the 'präventive Wirkung der Ersthaftierung', but the court found those content-attributions inaccurate.

Questions this record answers

What happened in 12 Os 124/25i?: Fabricated: Case Law | Numerous cited decisions contained incorrect Prüfzeichen (wrong docket numbers) and were relied on by the complaint.
Why does 12 Os 124/25i matter for legal AI risk?: Multiple wrong docket numbers in one brief signals AI use; require a second-reader cite check before any appellate filing.
What does the public record establish about 12 Os 124/25i?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this 12 Os 124/25i summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

United States v. Michael Shane DeBaere (2)W.D. Virginia · Jan 23, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Sentencia 000126/2025TSJ Gran Canaria · Dec 31, 2025fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Rivard v. Dept. of CorrectionsVermont SC · Dec 10, 2025fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Fiscalía General de la Nación v. Luis Alberto Contreras FandinoeTribunal Superior de Bogotá · Dec 2, 2025fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Elías Axel Roberto Rafael s/ Abuso sexual con acceso carnalCSJ de Tucumán · Nov 28, 2025fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)USA v. BrewerM.D. Florida · Sep 11, 2025fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Numerous cited decisions contained incorrect Prüfzeichen (wrong docket numbers) and were relied on by the complaint.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 13 Os 15/17f was cited for the concept of 'Kuriertätern', but the court found the cited decision did not contain that asserted content.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 13 Os 99/15f was cited regarding 'Alias Namen' of telephone calls, but the court found the decision did not support that assertion.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 13 Os 81/07x was cited for a so-called 'Verschleifungsverbot', which the court determined the decision did not establish as claimed.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation 14 Os 11/09p was cited for an 'umfassendes Geständnis' and the 'präventive Wirkung der Ersthaftierung', but the court found those content-attributions inaccurate.

Questions this record answers

What happened in 12 Os 124/25i?

Fabricated: Case Law | Numerous cited decisions contained incorrect Prüfzeichen (wrong docket numbers) and were relied on by the complaint.

Why does 12 Os 124/25i matter for legal AI risk?

Multiple wrong docket numbers in one brief signals AI use; require a second-reader cite check before any appellate filing.

What does the public record establish about 12 Os 124/25i?

Which source supports this 12 Os 124/25i summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.