Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
14 Os 95/25i
Oberster Gerichtshof · Oct 7, 2025
AustriaEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycriminal
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Numerous Fehlzitate of Oberster Gerichtshof decisions, many of which were non-existent or not on the cited topic; court declined to address these AI-generated citations.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Austria's OGH declines to address AI-fabricated Fehlzitate entirely; unverified citations forfeit the argument.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Numerous Fehlzitate of Oberster Gerichtshof decisions, many of which were non-existent or not on the cited topic; court declined to address these AI-generated citations.
Operational lesson
Austria's OGH declines to address AI-fabricated Fehlzitate entirely; unverified citations forfeit the argument.
Record details
CourtOberster Gerichtshof
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateOct 7, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Numerous Fehlzitate of Oberster Gerichtshof decisions, many of which were non-existent or not on the cited topic; court declined to address these AI-generated citations.
- Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Incorrectly cited or attributed 'Verfahrensergebnisse' (procedural results) that do not appear at the referenced locations in the file.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Multiple faulty quotations/attributions from alleged higher-court decisions (false quotes or misattributions) present in the AI-generated submissions.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in 14 Os 95/25i?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Numerous Fehlzitate of Oberster Gerichtshof decisions, many of which were non-existent or not on the cited topic; court declined to address these AI-generated citations.
- Why does 14 Os 95/25i matter for legal AI risk?
- Austria's OGH declines to address AI-fabricated Fehlzitate entirely; unverified citations forfeit the argument.
- What does the public record establish about 14 Os 95/25i?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this 14 Os 95/25i summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.