Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
ATSJ NA 38/2024
TSJ Navarra · Sep 4, 2024
SpainEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotescriminaltrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Inclusion in the complaint of a quoted statutory provision 'artículo 454B del Código Penal' attributed to the Spanish Supreme Court; the Sala found the provision does not exist in Spanish law and corresponds to the Penal Code of Colombia, and traced the source to use of ChatGPT 3.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- ChatGPT cited a Colombian statute as Spanish law — never let a consumer chatbot quote foreign codes into your brief.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Inclusion in the complaint of a quoted statutory provision 'artículo 454B del Código Penal' attributed to the Spanish Supreme Court; the Sala found the provision does not exist in Spanish law and corresponds to the Penal Code of Colombia, and traced the source to use of ChatGPT 3.
Operational lesson
ChatGPT cited a Colombian statute as Spanish law — never let a consumer chatbot quote foreign codes into your brief.
Record details
CourtTSJ Navarra
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateSep 4, 2024
CH
AI toolCHATGPT 3
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
CHATGPT 3 is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | Inclusion in the complaint of a quoted statutory provision 'artículo 454B del Código Penal' attributed to the Spanish Supreme Court; the Sala found the provision does not exist in Spanish law and corresponds to the Penal Code of Colombia, and traced the source to use of ChatGPT 3.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in ATSJ NA 38/2024?
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | Inclusion in the complaint of a quoted statutory provision 'artículo 454B del Código Penal' attributed to the Spanish Supreme Court; the Sala found the provision does not exist in Spanish law and corresponds to the Penal Code of Colombia, and traced the source to use of ChatGPT 3.
- Why does ATSJ NA 38/2024 matter for legal AI risk?
- ChatGPT cited a Colombian statute as Spanish law — never let a consumer chatbot quote foreign codes into your brief.
- What does the public record establish about ATSJ NA 38/2024?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this ATSJ NA 38/2024 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.