Home/Cases

Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Browse courts Browse judges Open map

Search

Country

US state

Editorial impact

Court

Judge / decision-maker

AI tool

Failure mode

Record status

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

Attribution: named tool recorded

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmount Impact

Kisha Peters v. Banner Healthpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. TexasTX · federalJan 15, 2026ChatGPT—low Viken v. Schuelkefabricated quotes · misrepresented authority · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewMinnesota DCMN · stateJan 13, 2026Lexis Assist—medium Gharavi v. Google LLCfake citations · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. CaliforniaCA · federalJan 12, 2026Bloomberg Law—low Pearl Gardner v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. ArizonaAZ · federalJan 9, 2026Clearpoint—high Case No. 2025가단10169pro se · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. DaeguSouth Korea · internationalJan 6, 2026ChatGPT—low Dudak (Re)pro se · fake citations · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus viewSafeRoads AlbertaCanada · internationalJan 2, 2026ChatGPT—low M Peiu v Hywel Dda University Local Health Boardpro se · fake citations · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewEmployment Tribunal (Swansea)United Kingdom · internationalDec 30, 2025ChatGPT—low Billups v. Louisville Municipal School Districtfake citations · misrepresented authority · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. MississippiMS · federalDec 19, 2025Grok—high Wanyu Zhang v. National Public Radio, Inc.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. DCDC · federalDec 18, 2025Google search engine AI features$1,000.00medium Harvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. Bankpro se · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. NevadaNV · federalDec 15, 2025ChatGPT—low Mr J Harrison v Mr D May t/a Leeds Gymnastics Academypro se · fake citations · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewEmployment Tribunals (Leeds)United Kingdom · internationalDec 10, 2025ChatGPT—medium Jodell Dodge v. FirstService Residential Arizona LLCfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. ArizonaAZ · federalDec 8, 2025Federally Lawyer—high Shana Jordan, et al. v. Chicago Housing Authority et al.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewCC IllinoisIL · stateDec 5, 2025ChatGPT$59.5Khigh Dalton Gage Hill v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority (1)fake citations · civil rights · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. OklahomaOK · federalDec 4, 2025ChatGPT—low Jarrus et al. v. Governor of Michigan et al.pro se · misrepresented authority · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. MichiganMI · federalDec 2, 2025ChatGPT Plus$600medium Cappucci v. Maupin, Cox & Legoy, LLPpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewNevada DCNV · stateNov 30, 2025ChatGPT—low Lessard c. Longuépéepro se · fake citations · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewQuébecCanada · internationalNov 26, 2025ChatGPT—low Re Walkerfake citations · misrepresented authority · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC VictoriaAustralia · internationalNov 24, 2025CourtAid; ChatGPT—low Mark Jennings v NatWest Group PLCpro se · fake citations · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewSheriff Appeal CourtUnited Kingdom · internationalNov 21, 2025ChatGPT—low Buchanan v. Vuori, Inc.fake citations · fabricated quotes · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. CaliforniaCA · federalNov 20, 2025ChatGPT-4, OpenAI, Claude, Clear Brief, Lexis Nexis & Westlaw$250.00high ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2025:4814fake citations · misrepresented authority · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewRechtbank Noord-NederlandNetherlands · internationalNov 19, 2025ChatGPT—low Yuehong v. The Minister of Citizenship & Immigrationfake citations · administrative · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewFederal CourtCanada · internationalNov 19, 2025ChatGPT—medium Kim v. Insurance Australiafake citations · tort · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewACT CATAustralia · internationalNov 18, 2025Bard—low UK and R (Munir) v Secretary of State for the Home Departmentfake citations · misrepresented authority · bar referralIncluded in the selected corpus viewUpper TribunalUnited Kingdom · internationalNov 17, 2025Google AI Mode (Google search)—high United States v. Thomas Czartorski, et al.fake citations · misrepresented authority · criminalIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. KentuckyKY · federalNov 10, 2025ChatGPT—medium

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow