Home/Cases

Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Browse courts Browse judges Open map

Search

Country

US state

Editorial impact

Court

Judge / decision-maker

AI tool

Failure mode

Record status

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

Attribution: named tool recorded

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmount Impact

Glenn Wilder and Others v. President & Fellows of Harvard College and Otherstort · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC MassachussettsSC · stateMay 18, 2026MX2.law—low Leung v Omnia Inclusive Employment Solutions Ltdpro se · fake citations · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewFederal CourtAustralia · internationalMay 15, 2026ChatGPT—low Joseph Guy v. AFGEfabricated quotes · administrative · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. CaliforniaCA · federalMay 13, 2026Claude—low Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public Schoolspro se · fake citations · civil rightsIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. New MexicoNM · federalMay 7, 2026Centient AI—low Barber v. Morawafake citations · appellateIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA MichiganMI · stateMay 5, 2026Claude, ChatGPT, Westlaw, Lexis—low Jessica Fuller v. Hyde School, et al.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. MaineME · federalMay 5, 2026Claude or ChatGPT—medium Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassifake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. MississippiMS · federalMay 1, 2026Fastcase; Google AI—low Richard Paul Smith v. Verra Mobility Corporation et al.fake citations · misrepresented authority · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewM.D. FloridaFL · federalMay 1, 2026ChatGPT—low Sai Malena Jimenez-Fogarty v. Thomas Fogarty et al.fake citations · civil rights · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. New YorkNY · federalApr 29, 2026LexisNexis$2.5Kmedium Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2)fake citations · misrepresented authority · employmentIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. CaliforniaCA · federalApr 28, 2026CoCounsel$1.0Kmedium Tekoma Chaney v. Transdev Services Inc. et al.fake citations · civil rights · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewC.D. CaliforniaCA · federalApr 28, 2026LexisNexis+ (Protégé)$2.5Kmedium Boonstra v Edmonton (City)pro se · fake citations · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus viewCourt of King’s Bench of AlbertaCanada · internationalApr 21, 2026ChatGPT—low Stance Strong and Kinisha Strong v. Zubha Pop Foods LLC d/b/a Popeyes Chickenpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA Illinois (1d)IL · stateApr 15, 2026Centient AI—medium United States v. Farrisfake citations · fabricated quotes · bar referralIncluded in the selected corpus view6th Cir. CAUnited States · federalApr 3, 2026Westlaw CoCounsel—career ending In the Interest of W.G., Minor Childpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA IowaIA · stateApr 1, 2026Perplexity—medium Evgeny Yaroshevsky v. Karlin et al.pro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. New YorkNY · federalMar 31, 2026Gemini—low Heimkes v. Fairhope Motorcoach Resort Condominium Owners Association, Inc.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. AlabamaAL · federalMar 31, 2026Cocounsel (Westlaw)$55.6Khigh Joel A. Rivera v. Triad Properties Corporation, et al.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. AlabamaAL · federalMar 31, 2026ChatGPT$47,056.90career ending Rushing v. Turnerfabricated quotes · tort · trialIncluded in the selected corpus view19th JD, LouisianaLA · stateMar 27, 2026EVE—low State National Insurance Company, Inc. v. Damon Treadwell, et al.fake citations · fabricated quotes · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. AlabamaAL · federalMar 26, 2026ChatGPT; OpenCase—high Daniel Gentry v. Calvin Thompson et al.fake citations · civil rights · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. LouisianaLA · federalMar 20, 2026ChatGPT$1.3Khigh State v. Colemanfake citations · fabricated quotes · bar referralIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA OhioOH · stateMar 20, 2026ChatGPT$2.0Kcareer ending RvVb-A-2526-0597fake citations · misrepresented authority · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus viewRvVbBelgium · internationalMar 19, 2026ChatGPT—low Forest Ridge Townhomes Corporation of Greensboro v. Heag Pain Management Center et al.fake citations · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewNorth Carolina Court of AppealsNC · federalMar 18, 2026Perplexity.AI—low Riddle Aggregates v. Commissioner of Internal Revenuefake citations · tax · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewTax CourtUnited States · federalMar 18, 2026Grammarly, ChatGPT, and Gemini—low

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow