Home/Cases

Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Browse courts Browse judges Open map

Search

Country

US state

Editorial impact

Court

Judge / decision-maker

AI tool

Failure mode

Record status

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

Attribution: named tool recorded

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmount Impact

John A. Griffithsfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewArizona State BarAZ · stateMar 13, 2026Eve.legal$1.2Khigh Cartagena v. Dixon, Blackburn, and T.A. Blackburn Law (1)fake citations · bar referral · tortIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. New YorkNY · federalMar 10, 2026Protégé (LexisNexis)—high Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al.pro se · civil rights · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. IllinoisIL · federalMar 10, 2026ChatGPT—low Chevalier-Hernandez v Poplar Dock Management Company Ltdpro se · fake citations · landlord tenantIncluded in the selected corpus viewFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)United Kingdom · internationalMar 9, 2026ChatGPT—low Kattom v. Bondifake citations · fabricated quotes · civil rightsIncluded in the selected corpus viewW.D. LouisianaLA · federalMar 6, 2026ChatGPT$1.0Kmedium Kim Elizabeth Harwell v. WestCare Nevada, Inc.pro se · fake citations · tortIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. NevadaNV · federalMar 6, 2026ChatGPT—low ELG20 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenshippro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewFederal Circuit and Family CourtAustralia · internationalMar 5, 2026ChatGPT; OpenAI—low G.M. v. A.I. S.p.A.misrepresented authority · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewTrib. FerraraItaly · internationalMar 4, 2026ChatGPT—low Kosel Equity v. McGregorfake citations · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC ConnecticutCT · stateFeb 19, 2026ChatGPT—low Tung Lai Lam v Oriental Online Limited & Ors (DCEO 12/2024)pro se · misrepresented authority · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewDistrict CourtChina · internationalFeb 16, 2026GPT-4o—medium CVTEK, LLC (B-423943; B-423943.2)fake citations · misrepresented authority · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus viewGAOUnited States · federalFeb 12, 2026Westlaw CoCounsel—low Thomas Carl Dodds, Jr. v. Carrie Bridgespro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus view10th Cir. CAUnited States · federalFeb 11, 2026ChatGPT—low Matter of Zarehfake citations · misrepresented authority · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC New YorkNY · stateFeb 10, 2026ChatGPT—high Kusmin L. Amarsingh v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.fake citations · fabricated quotes · bar referralIncluded in the selected corpus view10th Cir. CAUnited States · federalFeb 9, 2026ChatGPT$1.0Khigh Arkansas DHS v. April Ward and Minor Child Respondentsfake citations · fabricated quotes · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC ArkansasAR · stateFeb 5, 2026Copilot—high Flycatcher v. Affable Avenue (2)fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. New YorkNY · federalFeb 5, 2026NotebookLM; vLex; Paxton AI$38.9Khigh Pasuengos v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2)fake citations · bar referral · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus viewFederal Circuit and Family CourtAustralia · internationalFeb 3, 2026Google search AI summary—high Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Overstock.com, Inc.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. KansasKS · federalFeb 2, 2026ChatGPT$12.0Khigh Ortiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otrosfake citations · bar referral · tortIncluded in the selected corpus viewJCC de TucumánArgentina · internationalFeb 2, 2026ChatGPT—high PSAHSC v. Tchampetfabricated quotes · misrepresented authority · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus viewHigh CourtUnited Kingdom · internationalJan 30, 2026Microsoft Co-Pilot—low Folarin v. The Immigration Services Commissionnerpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewFirst-tier TribunalUnited Kingdom · internationalJan 29, 2026ChatGPT—low Resolución Nº 00152-2026, Expediente 19-000531-0275-PEmisrepresented authority · criminal · appellateIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA San JoséCosta Rica · internationalJan 29, 2026ChatGPT—low Lifetime Well LLC v. IBSpot.com Inc.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. PennsylvaniaPA · federalJan 26, 2026Lexis+ AI; LexisNexis Protégé$4.0Kmedium That Xiong v. Minga Wofford (1)fake citations · immigration · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. CaliforniaCA · federalJan 22, 2026ChatGPT—low Rev. Heidi Grossman Lepp v. Conrad Mallett, Jr., et al.pro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. MichiganMI · federalJan 16, 2026OpenAI ChatGPT-4o—low

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow