Home/Cases

Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Browse courts Browse judges Open map

Search

Country

US state

Editorial impact

Court

Judge / decision-maker

AI tool

Failure mode

Record status

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

Attribution: named tool recorded

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmount Impact

QTR v BXD ([2025] NZERA 716)pro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewEmployment Relations AuthorityNew Zealand · internationalNov 7, 2025ChatGPT—low Clarke v State of Queensland (Department of Education)pro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewQueensland IRCAustralia · internationalNov 5, 2025ChatGPT—low Choksi v IPSfake citations · misrepresented authority · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewHigh CourtUnited Kingdom · internationalNov 4, 2025Google AI Overview—low Isaacs v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporationfake citations · employment · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. New JerseyNJ · federalNov 3, 2025ChatGPT—high Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard Louis Pazdernik, Jr.fake citations · misrepresented authority · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewIowa SC Attorney Disciplinary BoardIA · stateOct 31, 2025ChatGPT—high S… F… c. I… O…pro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewQuébec SCCanada · internationalOct 31, 2025ChatGPT—low In re: the Marriage of Melinda Johnson v. Sabastian Johnsonpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA IndianaIN · stateOct 30, 2025ChatGPT—low Safe Choice, LLC v. City of Clevelandfake citations · misrepresented authority · civil rightsIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. OhioOH · federalOct 30, 2025Amicus (Casemine)$7.5Kmedium Bourse de l'Immobilier Multilogements inc. c. Lanthierpro se · fake citations · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewCS QuébecCanada · internationalOct 29, 2025ChatGPT—medium Case 9/2025misrepresented authority · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewHøjesteret (Supreme Court)Denmark · internationalOct 29, 2025ChatGPT—low Joy Wilson v. KIPP Texas, Inc.fabricated quotes · employment · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewN.D. TexasTX · federalOct 29, 2025ChatGPT—medium Mezu v. Mezufake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA MarylandMD · stateOct 29, 2025ChatGPT—high Director of Public Prosecutions v Denis Micurapro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewAdministrative CourtUnited Kingdom · internationalOct 28, 2025ChatGPT—low Green Building Initiative, Inc. v. Stephen R. Peacock & Green Globe Limitedfake citations · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. OregonOR · federalOct 27, 2025Copilot—low In re: Sanctions Order of Kenneyfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA LouisianaLA · stateOct 23, 2025ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google$1.4Khigh Mattox v. Product Innovation Researchfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. OklahomaOK · federalOct 22, 2025ChatGPT$29,495.90high Flores v. NICHApro se · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC New YorkNY · stateOct 15, 2025Grok—low Lugasi (Aklim Systems) v. Netivot Municipalitypro se · fake citations · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewBeersheba Magistrate's CourtIsrael · internationalOct 15, 2025ChatGPT—low Yasiel Puig Valdes v. All3Media America, LLC, et al.fake citations · appellateIncluded in the selected corpus viewSCA California (Los Angeles)CA · stateOct 15, 2025ChatGPT—high Gloriose Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City Universityfake citations · bar referral · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewCounty Court (Birmingham)United Kingdom · internationalOct 14, 2025LEAP legal software—high United States v. Glennie Antonio McGeefake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. AlabamaAL · federalOct 10, 2025Ghostwriter Legal$5.0Khigh AK v Secretary of State for the Home Departmentfake citations · immigration · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewUpper TribunalUnited Kingdom · internationalOct 6, 2025ChatGPT—low Smith v. Athena Construction Group, Inc.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. DCDC · federalOct 3, 2025Grammarly; ProWritingAid$8,151.00high Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et alfake citations · administrative · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. UtahUT · federalSep 30, 2025ChatGPT—low ANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Departmentfake citations · misrepresented authority · immigrationIncluded in the selected corpus viewUpper TribunalUnited Kingdom · internationalSep 29, 2025Microsoft Copilot—low

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow