Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 29, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/Cases
Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

403 matching matters

Showing 301-325 · Page 13 of 17

Download these 403 results (CSV)

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmountImpact
Specter Aviation Limited v. Lapradepro se · fake citations · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewCS QuébecCanada · internationalOct 1, 2025Unidentified—mediumANPV and SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Departmentfake citations · misrepresented authority · immigrationIncluded in the selected corpus viewUpper Tribunal (IAC)United Kingdom · internationalSep 29, 2025Microsoft Copilot—mediumSonkin v. Roll Profile Ltdfake citations · employment · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewHaifa Labour CourtIsrael · internationalSep 29, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—mediumTajudin bin Gulam Rasul and another v Suriaya bte Haja Mohideenfake citations · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewHigh CourtSingapore · internationalSep 29, 2025Unidentified—mediumNº 5005798-22.2025.8.24.0005/SCfabricated quotes · other · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewTJ San CatarinaBrazil · internationalSep 23, 2025No tool named in source—mediumSentenza del 23.09.2025fake citations · misrepresented authority · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewTribunale di LatinaItaly · internationalSep 23, 2025Unidentified—mediumLipe v. Albuquerque Public Schools (1)fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. New MexicoNM · federalSep 22, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$3.0KmediumAli v. IT People Corporationpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. MichiganMI · federalSep 19, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)$600mediumGibralter v. DMS Flowersfake citations · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. CaliforniaCA · federalSep 19, 2025Unidentified—mediumOTG New York, Inc. v. Ottogi America, Inc.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewD. New JerseyNJ · federalSep 18, 2025Unidentified$3.0KmediumPelishek v. City of Sheboyganfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. WisconsinWI · federalSep 18, 2025Westlaw's Quick Check and AI Case Search Tool$4.5KmediumAgravo de Instrumento nº 5059805-76.2025.8.24.0000fake citations · fabricated quotes · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewTJ San CatarinaBrazil · internationalSep 16, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—mediumBKA Holdings v. Sampro se · fake citations · contractIncluded in the selected corpus viewCA IllinoisIL · stateSep 16, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—mediumR.G.L. n. 1018/2025administrative · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewTribunale di TorinoItaly · internationalSep 16, 2025Unidentified—mediumFacey v. Fisher, Liane et al.fake citations · misrepresented authority · tortIncluded in the selected corpus viewSC New YorkNY · stateSep 15, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—mediumYi-Sheng Fang, et al. v. Hechalou US LLC, et al.fake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewC.D. CaliforniaCA · federalSep 12, 2025Unidentified$2.4KmediumNº 1001467-35.2024.5.02.0467 (ROT)fake citations · employment · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewLabour Court 2nd DistrictBrazil · internationalSep 8, 2025Unidentified—mediumCommNV vs Uprisefake citations · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewNevada DCNV · stateSep 5, 2025No tool named in source$5.0KmediumBlake Lewis v. Entergy Mississippi, LLCfake citations · misrepresented authority · otherIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. MississippiMS · federalSep 3, 2025Unidentified—mediumKaren Tyler v Attorney General of Canadapro se · fake citations · administrativeIncluded in the selected corpus viewFederal CourtCanada · internationalSep 3, 2025ChatGPT—mediumMark Khoury v Nira Kooijpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewSupreme Court of QueenslandAustralia · internationalSep 3, 2025AI (implied, unspecified)—mediumPete v. Houston Methodist Hospitalpro se · fake citations · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewE.D. TexasTX · federalSep 3, 2025Unidentified—mediumXAI v XAH and another matterpro se · fake citations · published opinionIncluded in the selected corpus viewFamily CourtSingapore · internationalSep 3, 2025ChatGPT—mediumBackhoe Center Ltd. v. Abu Gwaidfake citations · contract · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewBeersheba Magistrate's CourtIsrael · internationalSep 1, 2025No tool named in source—mediumLonnie Allbaugh v. University of Scrantonpro se · fake citations · fabricated quotesIncluded in the selected corpus viewM.D. PennsylvaniaPA · federalAug 28, 2025Unidentified$1.0Kmedium
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook

AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).

APA

AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases

URL

https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow